WalletGrower
Tools ยท Grow Wealth
Grow Wealth ยท retirement

Retirement projection

Project every year of your financial life โ€” accumulation and decumulation. See the nest egg at retirement, whether the money lasts, and what moves the needle if it doesn't.

About you

35
65
92

Savings today

$45,000
$800

Assumptions

7.0%
5.0%
$70,000
3.0%

Nest egg at age 65

$1,341,219

Built from $333,000 contributed over 30 yrs ยท rest is compound growth.

Short โ€” you run out at age 89

That's 3 years before your life expectancy of 92. Raise the monthly contribution, delay retirement, or lower annual spending to close the gap.

You'll contribute

$333,000

Compound growth

$1,008,219

Spent in retirement

$2,849,674

Balance over your lifetime

SavingSpending
$0$335,305$670,610$1,005,914$1,341,219Retire @ 65Age 35Age 49Age 64Age 78Age 92
Show the mathExpand โ†’

Accumulation โ€” we compound balance monthly at your pre-retirement return, adding the contribution every month: balance โ† balanceยท(1 + r/12) + PMT.

Decumulationโ€” at retirement age we subtract annual spending (inflated from today's dollars), then let the remainder grow at the post-retirement return for the rest of the year. Repeat until life expectancy or zero.

year_n_spending = base_spending ยท (1 + inflation)n

Deterministic projection โ€” not Monte Carlo. Real market sequences are lumpy, and a bad first decade in retirement (sequence-of-returns risk) can shift outcomes meaningfully. Treat this as a directional answer, not a promise.

How we built this tool

How this projection runs the math

Step 1

Accumulation phase: compound monthly

Starts from today's balance. Adds your monthly contribution, compounds at your pre-retirement return, snapshots yearly.

Step 2

Decumulation phase: inflation-adjusted spending

At retirement age, the annual spending figure inflates by your chosen rate each year. Balance grows at the more-conservative post-retirement return.

Step 3

Deterministic โ€” not Monte Carlo

One scenario, one answer. Real markets are lumpy; a bad first decade in retirement (sequence-of-returns risk) shifts results. Treat this as directional.